A Vision of Retirement Under the 20/20 Proposal
May 08, 2012
Would the government want to encourage workers to save LESS? A recent proposal by the deficit reduction committee calls for a reduction to the total combined annual limitations for both the employer and employee to retirement savings plans. Called the 20/20 Cap Proposal, the committee suggested a cap of the lesser of 20% of an employee’s compensation or $20,000 in annual total employer and employee retirement plan contributions. Although this sounds higher than the current 2012 deferral limit of $17,000 that employees are restricted to now, the 20/20 Cap Proposal will also include employer contributions that now has a $50,000 or 100% of income limitation for 2012. This combined limit of only $20,000 will severely limit the tax benefits of business owners to sponsor a retirement plan. According to the American Benefits Council, “ When a typical small business owner evaluates the significant legal responsibilities, risks, and costs of voluntarily sponsoring a retirement plan, it is often the promise of meaningful tax benefits for key employees that is the deciding factor in choosing to establish and maintain a retirement plan. But if tax benefits to decision-makers are substantially diminished, businesses that would have considered plan sponsorship may no longer do so, and existing plan sponsors might reduce employer matching contributions or stop offering retirement plans altogether. All employees would suffer because employer sponsorship offers considerable advantages for workers, including strict fiduciary standards; participation rules that ensure that benefits are delivered across all income groups; easy payroll reduction; lower fees from group participation; access to financial education; and often significant employer contributions.” Continue reading “A Vision of Retirement Under the 20/20 Proposal”