3 Reasons To Make After-Tax Contributions To Your Retirement Plan

April 25, 2016

Updated for current tax figures

Are you lucky enough to have the option to save after-tax money in your employer’s retirement plan? Most employees probably haven’t given it a thought, and not many utilize the option to save more than the current $18,500 pre-tax annual employee contribution limit (plus another $6,000 if you are 50 and older).

In fact, many people are not even aware that they may be able to save additional money in their employer-sponsored retirement plan, in some cases up to the annual total defined contribution limit (from both employee and employer) of $55,000 (plus $6,000 catch up if 50 and older) or 100% of your compensation, whichever is less. Sure, the likelihood of saving that much for many people might be small.

However, if you are already contributing the maximum in pre-tax and Roth contributions, here are some reasons to save more after-tax:

Automatic savings

Saving for an early retirement or financial independence? Let’s face it. It’s unlikely you’d save that much or invest on such a consistent schedule if you had to write a check every two weeks to a mutual fund company.

That’s one reason your employer can be your best financial services provider. Saving after-tax money in your retirement plan can be as easy as clicking a button or signing a form to choose what percentage of your salary you want to save. Every paycheck, you’ll defer money into after-tax savings and invest them in plan funds, just like your regular contributions. Little by little, you’ll save and grow that extra money without having to think about it.

Ability to withdraw contributions

You should generally be able to withdraw after-tax voluntary contributions, subject to the plan guidelines on withdrawals, even before you’re 59 1/2 and without meeting a specific need like you often do for a hardship withdrawal. That means if you have an emergency, you will be able to access those funds.

However, you may not be able to withdraw associated earnings growth, and if you are, those earnings – but not your original contributions – would be subject to taxes and a 10% penalty if withdrawn prior to age 59 1/2.

Tax-free rollover to a Roth IRA

You’ll reap the biggest rewards from your after-tax contributions when you leave your company or retire. Assuming you’ve been saving for a while, your after-tax balance will contain two components: your original after tax contributions and the tax-deferred earnings growth on those contributions. The IRS allows you to separate those two components out during the rollover process, so you can do a direct rollover into multiple destinations: rolling the tax-deferred earnings growth into a traditional IRA and rolling your after-tax contributions into a Roth IRA.

That’s right. You read that correctly. Your after-tax voluntary contributions can be rolled into a Roth IRA, where any future earnings growth will then be tax-free (assuming you leave the money in the Roth for at least five years and until after age 59 ½ ). You may even be able to convert your after-tax contributions immediately to Roth and have all future growth tax-free (but then you give up the ability to withdraw it early).

Here’s an example: Jane is already contributing the maximum $18,500/year to her pre-tax 401(k) plan at XYZ Company. She wants to save extra for retirement, so she saves an additional $10,000 annually in after-tax voluntary contributions in the plan.

After 10 years, Jane has about $144,000 from her after-tax contributions ($100,000 in contributions and $44,000 in growth). She also has about $260,000 in pre-tax savings and growth from contributing the maximum. When she leaves XYZ to take a new job, she can roll her plan balances into multiple destinations: $100,000 into a Roth IRA and $304,000 into a traditional IRA or her new employer’s 401(k) plan.

Fast forward another 15 years to when Jane retires. Without adding any more money to her Roth IRA and receiving a 7% return, her account is now worth about $285,000. That’s an additional $185,000 of tax-free growth, all because she originally saved after-tax money in her 401(k) plan.

 

 

Delaying Social Security May Still Make Sense Under the New Law

April 21, 2016
At the end of this month, two strategies (often called “claim now and claim more later” and “file and suspend”) to maximize total Social Security benefits between spouses will be going away. Under current rules, you could file for a spousal benefit equal to one half of your benefit at full retirement age and then switch to your higher benefit later. Under the new rules, it will be much simpler. When you file, you’ll either get your benefit or the spousal benefit, whichever is higher. Although you will no longer be able to collect a spousal benefit in the meantime, there are still several good reasons why delaying your benefits may make sense:
 
1) You’ll probably collect more over your lifetime. The Social Security benefits are supposed to be calculated so you get the same amount if you live until the average life expectancy. (A 65 yr old woman can expect to live to age 87 and a 65 yr old man can expect to live to age 84.)You’d be better off collecting earlier if you live to less than life expectancy and later if you live longer. However, those calculations were based on older life expectancy numbers that were lower and people are continuing to live longer and longer.
 
2) It’s probably a better investment. Your Social Security benefits grow by about 8% for each year you delay. That’s more than your investments can be guaranteed to earn and more than they’re likely to earn, especially if you’re more conservative in your retirement years. You might as well use your lower earning investments to cover your expenses and let your Social Security benefits continue to grow until age 70.
 
3) You may reduce the taxes on your Social Security. Since you won’t need to withdraw as much from taxable accounts to supplement the higher Social Security checks, less of those checks may be subject to taxes. Drawing down your taxable accounts while you delay will also mean smaller required minimum distributions when you turn 70 ½.
 
4) You can reduce the risk of outliving your money. One of the greatest risks retirees face is outliving their savings. In that case, you’ll be glad you have that higher Social Security check in your later years.
 
5) Your surviving spouse will be better protected. If you don’t live quite as long as you hope, you won’t miss not getting those Social Security checks but your spouse will be able to collect a bigger survivor benefit.
 
There are a couple of reasons I can think of not to delay. One is if you simply don’t have enough assets to cover your expenses while you wait. The second is if you think you have a below average life expectancy and no spouse to collect your survivor benefits. In that case, you might prefer to leave more of your assets to your heirs. But if neither of those apply to you, just remember that good things come to those who wait.
 
 
 
 

Are Self-Directed IRAs a Good Idea?

April 18, 2016

If you could buy a private business, a rental property or racehorses in your Individual Retirement Account (IRA), would you do so? Even if you could, would that be a wise choice? Self-directed IRAs (SD-IRA) offering non-traditional investments have become increasingly popular and more broadly available.

The self-directed IRA is a traditional or Roth IRA in which the custodian, the financial institution which keeps records and reports to the IRS, permits the full range of investments allowed by law in retirement accounts. Many types of investments are permitted in IRAs, but there are certain things you can’t do, like buy collectibles (such as art and coins) and life insurance, as well as investment strategies that require borrowing, such as shorting stock or certain options strategies. However, the reality is the vast majority of financial institutions limit retirement account investments to the more traditional ones like stocks, bonds, mutual funds, CDs and exchange-traded funds.

“Self-Directed” Really Means “Alternative Investments Accepted”

The term “self-directed” is a bit off base. What it means is that alternative investments are accepted or offered by the IRA custodian. Technically, at most financial institutions, IRAs default to the more literal interpretation of “self-directed,” in that the account owner makes the final decisions on what investments to buy or sell, unless they have given discretion in writing to an investment advisor.

A custodian who offers self-directed IRAs agrees to keep required records of your non-traditional investments in the IRA and report them to the IRS. The custodian may or may not offer physical custody of the investment, depending on type, or may just house the records of investment activity and valuation. Common alternative investments available in SD-IRAs are precious metals, real estate, loans, and private equity.  Certain custodians of self-directed IRA accounts will accept just about anything allowed by the IRS, including tax lien certificates and dairy cows.

Very High Risk

Many alternative investments available in SD-IRAs carry a high risk of losing all or most of your money due to lack of diversification or the inherent risk of the investment itself. You may not be able to sell the investment later (lack of liquidity), meaning that you won’t be able to access the value of it to make distributions in retirement. Keep in mind that the entire burden of investigating the investment (doing your “due diligence”) is on you, the account holder. This could be a benefit when you are investing in an area of your professional expertise (e.g., the experienced real estate investor). However, it can also lead to fraud, when investors are duped into Ponzi schemes or other types of investment scams through slick offerings and piles of legal paperwork.

Beware of investing in anything you don’t understand and can’t explain easily to others. If you are considering an investment within an SD-IRA, read this pamphlet from the SEC first and do your homework. Use the checklist at the end of this post. Remember, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

High Fees

Fees in self-directed IRAs are generally much higher than more traditional types of IRAs. Expect to pay set up fees, custodial fees and annual fees to value the investment. Many of the types of alternative investments offered in SD-IRAs are hard to value, so this can get quite pricey.

Keep in mind that the IRA or Roth IRA is the owner of the investment, so you don’t have direct control over it. With investments like real estate or a business, for example, that means you have to pay the custodian to do things like collect rents or business income. (Per this Bankrate article, some custodians propose that you set up a an IRA LLC to address this issue, which may give you checkbook control but is costly to establish and has legal risk.) No matter what, make sure you do some comparison shopping for a custodian who specializes in the type of investment you want to own in your SD-IRA.

Potential Tax Problems

Investors often get tripped up by unexpected tax consequences in SD-IRAs. Most importantly, in a traditional IRA, distributions in retirement are taxed as income, not the lower capital gains rate. The investor may have been better off holding the asset outside of a retirement account. Additionally, investors miss out on the ongoing favorable tax treatments for some common types of investments, such as real estate.

Depending on the type of investment income, a self-directed IRA may not be completely tax-deferred and a Roth IRA may not be completely tax-free. For example, if the investment generates Unrelated Business Income, the IRA or Roth IRA would be taxed at the high trust rates for the tax year in which it occurs. Those taxes must be paid by the IRA, not the account owner separately.

Can’t Invest in Yourself or Your Family

Don’t get too excited about selling the family business to your IRA! Certain transactions are prohibited in retirement accounts to prevent self-dealing, including transactions with people within your linear family, such as your spouse, your parents, your children, your grandchildren and their spouses. Most of your family could not work in or on behalf of the investment or live in a property held by the IRA.

When to Consider a Self Directed IRA?

SD-IRAs are not suitable for many people. Use this checklist to see if you might be a good candidate for self-directed IRA accounts: (Aim for at least 4 out of 6.)

  • I am an accredited investor. (If you don’t know what it is, you probably aren’t.) While you don’t need to be an accredited investor to open an SD-IRA, being one means you have the income and net worth to consider alternative investments.
  • I don’t need my IRA or Roth IRA for future retirement income. Either:
    • I am fully on track to completely fund my retirement with my employer-sponsored retirement plan, e.g., 401(k), 403(b), etc.
    • I have a pension or other investments (e.g., rental income) which will fully cover my retirement income needs.
  • I have well-diversified traditional investments in my work-sponsored and non-retirement brokerage accounts that can be liquidated to pay future living expenses if needed.
  • I have professional expertise and experience in the SD-IRA investment which I am considering.
  • I want to add a target percentage of precious metals to my retirement portfolio for diversification.
  • I am considering making a small private equity investment that might pay off big (a possible strategy in a Roth SD-IRA) but could also go bust.

How The Self-Employed Can Defer Taxes On Retirement Savings Too

April 14, 2016

Updated March, 2019

In our CEO’s book, What Your Financial Advisor Isn’t Telling You, Liz Davidson writes about understanding the importance of taxes to your investing returns. After all, it’s not just what you earn but what you actually keep. In honor of National Retirement Planning Week, I thought I’d write about one of the best ways to reduce taxes on your investing: qualified retirement plans.

By allowing you to defer taxes on your contributions and earnings until you withdraw the money, these plans benefit you in a couple of ways. First, you’re likely to pay a lower average tax rate on the withdrawals than on the contributions. (Even if you retire in the same tax bracket, a lot of your withdrawals will probably get taxed at lower rates because of how the tax code is structured.) Second, your investments will grow faster since the money that would otherwise be going to taxes is instead being reinvested.

Savings options for self-employed

But what if you or your spouse is self-employed? You can contribute to an IRA but you’re limited to only $6,000 a year or $7,000 if you’re over age 50. (One advantage to not having a retirement plan at work is being able to deduct all of your traditional IRA contributions regardless of your income.) Here are some other options if you’d like to put away a bit more in a tax-advantaged retirement account:

Individual 401(k). Also called a uni-401(k), solo 401(k) or a 401(k) for one, you’re only eligible if you have no partners or employees (other than maybe your spouse). The main advantage is that you can contribute up to $19,000 per year plus 25% of your earned income (there’s a special calculation of this) up to a total annual contribution of $56k plus an additional $6k if you’re over 50. Withdrawals are limited and subject to a 10% early withdrawal penalty but you can also set it up to allow you to borrow from the plan.

SEP-IRA. With a SEP-IRA, you can contribute 25% of your earned income (up to a total annual contribution of $56k plus an additional $6k if you’re over 50) but you have to contribute the same percentage of pay to each of your eligible employees. However, you can vary the percentage each year. Withdrawals are subject to a 10% early withdrawal penalty.

Simple IRA. With a Simple IRA, you generally cannot have more than 100 employees. Employees can contribute up to $13,000 per year (or $16,000 if over age 50) and you must either contribute 2% of income for each eligible employee (up to $5,600 a year) or provide a dollar-for-dollar match (up to $13,000 per year) of employee contributions of at least 3% of their income.  The penalty for early withdrawals is increased to 25% in the first two years and then 10% after that.

When I was self-employed, I chose the SEP-IRA since the individual 401(k) was too expensive for my needs (fees have come down a lot since then) and I couldn’t contribute as much to the Simple IRA (also didn’t like that higher penalty on early withdrawals).

If you or your spouse is self-employed, the individual 401(k) will allow you to contribute the highest amount and take a loan if necessary. If you have employees, it all depends on how much you want to contribute for yourself and for them. In any case, being self-employed is no excuse not to save for retirement and reduce your taxes in the process.

What The New Fiduciary Rule Could Mean For You

April 07, 2016

You may have heard by now that the Department of Labor announced a new rule requiring any advisor of a retirement account like a 401(k), IRA, and even an HSA to act as a fiduciary, putting their clients’ interest above their own. The good news is that this will drive out many glorified salespeople selling high-priced investments for a commission from “advising” people on their retirement accounts. The bad news is that many people who need advice may not be able to meet the asset minimums required by many fiduciary advisors or may not be willing to pay their asset management fees. If you’re in one of those camps, here are some options for you:

Target Date Funds

Since these funds aren’t providing personalized advice, they aren’t affected by the new rule but they can substitute for an investment advisor in many ways. All you need to do is pick the fund with the year closest to when you plan to retire. You can put all of your money into that one fund (in fact, they’re designed for that so adding more funds can actually throw off the balance of the fund) and set it and forget it. That’s because they are designed to be fully-diversified “one stop shops” that automatically become more conservative as you get closer to the target retirement date.

This doesn’t mean that all target date funds are the same. While they each have slightly different investment mixes, it’s been found that low fees are actually more important than getting the best mix (which no one can know in advance anyway). To minimize your costs, look for target date funds made up of low cost index funds.

Robo-Advisors

If you want a portfolio more customized to your particular risk tolerance, consider a “robo-advisor,” a new breed of automated online investment advisors that design a portfolio for you based on a questionnaire you answer. They already act as fiduciaries so they won’t be negatively impacted by the new rule. However, they tend to have much lower minimums and fees than human advisors.

Flat Fee Advisors

If you’re looking for more comprehensive financial advice or just prefer to work with a human being, another option is an advisor that charges fees that aren’t based on how much they’re managing. Instead, they may charge an hourly, monthly, or annual fee. However, these advisors are relatively rare so the number of local options may be limited.

There will be lots of changes as a result of the new fiduciary rule. Many investors will pay less in fees but if you’re currently working with a non-fiduciary advisor for your retirement account(s), you may have to find a new one. Fortunately, there are a lot of good alternatives if you know where to look.

 

The F Word In Financial Services – And Why You Need To Know It

April 04, 2016

Should financial advisors have to act in the best interest of their clients? Absolutely yes, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. The Office of Management and Budget will soon release the final version of the DOL’s fiduciary rule, which will require more of those who provide retirement investment advice to put their clients’ best interests first by expanding the type of retirement investment advice covered by fiduciary protections. What does this mean, and how will it impact employees saving for retirement?

The term “fiduciary” comes from the Latin word, “fiducia,” meaning trust. A fiduciary must act for the benefit of another person in a financial relationship and not for their own personal gain. Fiduciaries must disclose all conflicts of interest, and have a legal obligation to take into account the beneficiary’s circumstances, goals, risk tolerance, time horizon and investment experience. In other words, when you hire a fiduciary, he or she is legally and ethically required to act in your best interests.

The practical implication of this is that when choosing between two otherwise very similar investments, a fiduciary would choose the one with the lower costs. This is very helpful as the structure of much of the financial services industry is full of inherent conflicts of interest that don’t always favor consumers. A fiduciary can’t charge you ridiculously high commissions on an investment just because they have a mortgage to pay on their second home or their broker-dealer has a current sales promotion with a favored mutual fund company.

But wait…Aren’t all financial advisors supposed to do that anyway? Not to the same extent.

Many financial advisors operate under something called the “suitability standard,” which states that the advisor must have a “reasonable basis to believe that a recommended transaction or investment strategy involving a security or securities is suitable for the customer, based on the information obtained through reasonable diligence.”  This is why a financial advisor can sell you a mutual fund with a 4% up front sales charge, recommend investment strategies with lagging performance or encourage you to roll over your 401(k) into a higher fee account when you leave a job. Fellow Financial Finesse planner Erik Carter wrote about this conundrum for financial advisors recently in his Forbes column.

Thankfully, there are some financial advisors already follow the fiduciary standard, such as registered investment advisors (RIAs) and certain retirement plan advisors under ERISA, the law that governs employer-sponsored retirement plans. Fee-only financial advisors who are members of the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors sign a Fiduciary Oath as part of their membership. According to the CFP Board, “CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professionals providing financial planning services also must abide by the fiduciary standard,” acting “solely in the client’s best interest when offering personal financial planning advice,” and the Board has been very active in promoting adoption of the DOL rule and a uniform standard. However, some CFP® professionals work for big financial services firms who have not yet adopted the standard. So what is the new DOL rule likely to mean for retirement savers?

Lower fees

More types of retirement investment advice are covered, including for IRAs and individual work-sponsored retirement plan accounts. This could mean that certain types of investments are less easy to justify selling to retirement investors, such as high fee mutual funds, and may put downward pressure on fees overall. The DOL estimates that expanding who must provide fiduciary advice will save investors up to $40 billion in fees over the next ten years.

Less pressure to rollover your retirement plan to an IRA

According to a recent Wall Street Journal article, the new DOL rule will make it harder for advisers to recommend a rollover of your work-sponsored retirement plan if you leave your job, “as they will have to clearly document why it is in a client’s best interest. Additionally, once the money is in an IRA, advisers would generally have to avoid payments, including commissions, that create incentives for them to select one product over another.”

Rebuilds trust and confidence

The most consumer-friendly aspect of the expanded fiduciary rule is that it aligns the interests of retirement financial advisors and their clients. This eliminates conflicts of interest and gets financial advisors and clients on the same side of the table when it comes to retirement investing. If you know that your advisor is legally looking out for your best interest and not just looking to make a sale, this makes it more likely that you’ll consider his/her advice carefully.

More transparency should rebuild trust and confidence in financial advice. That is good for investors and good for financial services. The DOL rule has prompted the SEC to begin looking at adopting a Uniform Fiduciary Standard for all investment advice, not just retirement advice.

 

 

If At First You Don’t Succeed…

April 01, 2016

Over the weekend, my youngest (he’s 14 now) built a computer all by himself. He saved up money from odd jobs and birthdays and bought a bunch of computer parts. Eventually, he had enough parts to build the computer and on his first attempt at turning it on, it didn’t work. He looked terribly defeated and thought he had completely messed it up.

I have some friends who work in the I.T. field and I was texting them to get thoughts on what was wrong. Everything they suggested appeared to be in good order. So he and I made a trip to the store where he purchased the parts and we were able to get a tech to look at his computer.

There was one very small connector that wasn’t fully engaged, and the problem was fixed within seconds! We took it home, fired up the computer and it worked!  But it didn’t have Internet access. To a kid who just built a gaming computer, that’s a deal breaker.

So we spent the next hour installing an updated operating system and working on his network connection to no avail. Once again, he looked defeated. I suggested that we step back for a minute, grab a bite to eat and think.

While we were having dinner, we started talking about the parts he bought and what each part was for. I asked the simple question “did you buy a wireless adapter or wireless card?” and he started hysterically laughing. We had just wasted time on a task that was NEVER going to be successful because we had no wireless network adapter.

So we went back to the store and spent $15 on a wireless card and once he installed it, the computer worked perfectly, even better than he expected. The look of happiness on his face when he was able to hit the “on” button and know that he took something from idea, to effort, to final product was pretty cool. He was very pleased and I was very proud.  There’s something about seeing someone reach a goal that is so very rewarding.

I saw the same look on someone’s face today. She and I have been meeting for about 5 years now on a yearly or sometimes quarterly basis. When we met the first time, she thought at age 50 that retiring at age 55 was a ridiculous and impossible goal. But she wanted to tackle it and if she “failed” in that goal, she’d at least be ahead of her current pace.

So she radically altered her lifestyle and started cooking more and going to restaurants less. She compromised and decided to buy only $14/bottle (or less) wine, as opposed to her $30-$40/bottle norm. She started using the “fluff” in her budget, which was now totally removed, to pay down debt and increase her 401(k) contributions. She got rid of her BMW 7-series lease and bought a nice, reliable, used Honda Accord.

Every quarter, we would meet again and go over her expenses and her debt reduction. On the annual reviews, we would do retirement projections and what started out as “You’ve got some SERIOUS work to do” projections turned into “You’re making some serious progress” conversations. The last two years have been “You’re almost on track” and “You could actually pull this off.” It won’t be the lifestyles of the rich and famous, but it will be a life that she would find enjoyable.

When we last ran her numbers, she realized that she could – if she wanted – walk into her manager’s office and call it a career. There would be not a lot of cushion or margin for error, and she may opt to work part-time or do some short term assignments, but she walked out of the office feeling confident that she had the capacity to retire. She isn’t making any quick decisions, and it might make sense to work a bit longer to build a bigger margin for error, but I wouldn’t be shocked if we have a conversation in the next month or two and she tells me that she is writing her letter of resignation.

My son’s first few attempts at turning the computer on turned out to be not so spectacular. My “frequent flyer” didn’t see success when we ran retirement numbers the first time. Neither one got discouraged. Both kept looking for ways to get closer to their goals.

What are your goals? Whether you’re looking to build a computer or make plans to retire earlier than you may think you’re capable of, don’t let the first attempt get you down. As you find yourself coming up short on a goal, which we all do periodically, go back to the beginning, remember why you set the goal and let that drive you toward your next attempt, which will inevitably be closer to success.

 

5 Areas That May Need Some Financial Spring Cleaning

March 31, 2016

With Easter weekend behind us and spring officially in the air, it’s time for some spring cleaning. Don’t forget about cleaning your financial life too. While it’s much easier to see the clutter in your home, the clutter in your finances could have much bigger consequences. Here are several areas that may need some cleaning up:

Your expenses. If you’ve never taken a look at what you spend money on, it can be a real eye-opener. Start by gathering at least 3 months’ of bank and credit card statements and record each expense. You can also use a tool like Mint or Yodlee MoneyCenter to track your spending online for free.

Then go through your expenses and see what areas of waste you can cut. Are there things you’re spending money on that you don’t really need? If you do need it, can you get it in a way that costs less? You can get some ideas for savings here.

Your credit report. It’s been estimated that about 70% of credit reports have errors that could be hurting your score. If you haven’t done so in the last 12 months, you can order a free copy of each of your 3 credit reports (TransUnion, Equifax, and Experian) at the official site: annualcreditreport.com and report any discrepancies. You can also improve your score by getting current on your bills and paying down debt. Just be aware that old debt falls off your credit report after 7 years and making a partial payment or even acknowledging the debt to the creditor can restart that clock so if it’s getting close and you’re past your state’s statute of limitations for being sued by a creditor, you may just want to wait it out.

Your retirement account. Do you have retirement accounts that you left at previous jobs? If so, your overall retirement portfolio may not be properly diversified or you may be paying more than you need to in fees. Unless you have employer stock or are taking advantage of some unique investment option in the plan, you might want to roll those accounts to your current employer’s plan or into an IRA to make them easier to manage.

Your savings and investment portfolio. Many people have accounts they’ve opened or investments they’ve bought for different reasons over the years and now their savings and investments are a cluttered mess. Having 10 different bank accounts or 5 US stock funds isn’t diversification. Here are some simple ways to make sure you’re properly diversified.

Your legal documents. Tax documents only need to be kept for 7 years at the most. After that, you might as well just shred them. Estate planning documents should be checked to make sure they’re still up-to-date. Once your spouse finds out that your ex is still listed as your beneficiary or your youngest child wasn’t included, it may be too late.

How about you? Have you spring cleaned any of your finances? If so, share your experiences in the comments section below.

 

Can Life Insurance Be a Retirement Plan?

March 28, 2016

Listen to the radio these days and you’re likely to hear a commercial promising tax-free retirement income with no stock market risk. If you call a toll-free number or sign up on a website, you will probably get a follow up contact from a life insurance agent who wants to show you how you can use whole life or universal life insurance for tax-free retirement income. Doesn’t that sound too good to be true? Can permanent life insurance really be a retirement plan?

Be very, very cautious. Life insurance is not designed for retirement savings. Permanent life insurance is primarily designed to protect people in your family who rely on your income to maintain their standard of living. The “permanent” aspect means that this insurance protection stays with you for your life, as long as you pay the premiums.

Both major types of permanent insurance — whole life or universal life — include a death benefit component and a savings component. The savings component consists of a policy cash value, the amount of accumulated policy value which would be paid out to the insured if the policy were surrendered early. The “life insurance as retirement cash flow” strategies are based on the insured person borrowing against the cash value of their policy. While it is correct that you may borrow against the cash value in some circumstances without taxes, and that invested premiums grow tax deferred, there are some significant disadvantages.

A Loan is Not Income

A policy loan uses the cash value of the policy as collateral, and the insurance company charges the borrower interest on the loan. The interest is paid to the insurance company, not back to you. The interest rate may be the same, higher or lower than the rate you are crediting on the growth of the policy cash value. Financial planning expert Michael Kitces aptly calls this borrowing strategy, “nothing more than personal loan from the life insurance company.” That’s not real income.

Policy Dividends Helpful But Not Guaranteed

What about dividends? While certain types of insurance companies pay dividends to policyholders (who hold a “participating” policy) when their annual results are good (those dividends can be applied towards future premium payments or used to purchase additional coverage), they aren’t always likely to make profits every year. You may or may not receive dividends.

Potential Tax Problems

If you are eligible to receive policy dividends from a participating policy, they are not taxable. However, strategies that recommend borrowing against cash value life insurance have potential tax problems.  Should you borrow enough of your cash value so that the basis in the policy goes down to zero, you would have to put in more cash or risk a lapse of the policy and having the total outstanding loans included in your taxable income.

No Free Lunch

Another disadvantage of using life insurance as retirement savings are the fees. You’re paying for the insurance component. If you died early, your beneficiaries would receive the full death benefit, so you’ll be charged underwriting costs and mortality charges, etc. Plus you are paying for the distribution of the policy, in other words, commissions.  Someone’s getting paid, and those fees and charges eat into the type of returns you might otherwise earn if you invested the money into buying and holding tax-efficient index funds.

The Bottom Line: Do You Need Permanent Life Insurance?

Consider a life insurance proposal primarily in the context of your estate plan, not your retirement plan. Lifehappens.org has an overview of insurance basics and a helpful calculator to figure out how much insurance you actually need. Does the proposed policy meet your needs of providing for your family should something happen to you? Are you comfortable with/interested in having insurance protection you can’t outlive? How do the costs of this policy compare to costs of policies from other companies with the same face value?

If the life insurance meets those needs on its own merits, then your ability to borrow from it later on is an extra bonus. If paying premiums on this kind of life insurance policy are preventing you from other, more effective types of retirement savings, such as maxing out your tax-deferred retirement plans like your 401(k) and IRA/Roth IRA, that could do serious damage to your financial wellness. If you are on track for retirement, have low/no debt and need permanent insurance, then there may not be any harm. Don’t think of it as a retirement income strategy, however. Think of it as life insurance with access to a personal loan.

Do Your Homework

If you are considering one of the currently popular life insurance cash flow strategies, here are some questions to ask the insurance agent about your proposal:

  • How do you get paid?
  • What are the other fees involved — mortality, underwriting, surrender charges, investment management, etc.  Where can I see them reflected on your proposal?
  • What is the interest rate I’d be charged if I borrowed against my cash value?
  • What is the rate I’ll be credited on my cash value?
  • If I borrow from my cash value, can I repay that at any time? Are interest payments deducted from the cash value, or do I write checks for them?
  • What happens to the policy if I borrow the entire cash value?
  • What is the actual return net of all fees?
  • What’s the worst case scenario? Are there any circumstances in which I could be taxed? Lose money?  Lose my insurance?

How about you? Do you have a personal finance question you’d like answered on the blog? Email me at [email protected] or follow me on Twitter @cynthiameyer_FF.

 

Are You On the ‘If I’m Lucky’ Retirement Plan?

March 16, 2016

The other day, a friend asked me if contributing 18% of her salary into her 401(k) was enough to be saving for retirement. Instead of giving a simple yes or no answer as was expected, I had to answer with a question of my own, “Are you on track to retire?” Finding the answer to that question can seem complicated, but it doesn’t have to be. And unless you actually know whether or not you’re on track, it’s tough to make other financial decisions that may compete for your dollars. Continue reading “Are You On the ‘If I’m Lucky’ Retirement Plan?”

Two Calculations That May Surprise You

March 11, 2016

As the political season continues to drag on and presidential candidates drop out, we are inevitably going to be faced with a decision that makes many of us say “THIS is the best we can do from a pool of 300 million people?” Yet, the day will be upon us shortly and we will make a choice.  One of the things that I found interesting and a little bit fun was this political quiz that calculates how much you agree with the different presidential candidates on certain policy questions. The answers surprised me a little bit (and I’m not going to share how the quiz came out for me) and I’ve shared it with some friends to see where they landed. Continue reading “Two Calculations That May Surprise You”

Did You Contribute Too Much to a Roth IRA?

March 09, 2016
Updated June 14, 2017

One of the downsides of the Roth IRA is that there are income limits that preclude high income earners from contributing to these accounts. But for people on the cusp or for those who unexpectedly end up earning more than they planned (or who get married during the year and only discover after the fact that they now exceed the limits), it’s actually quite common to find out after they file their income taxes that they were actually ineligible to contribute the year before.

Luckily, the IRS understands that this can happen so there are ways to fix it, but you have to take certain steps to minimize the tax consequences and avoid penalties. Here are your choices if you contributed to a Roth IRA and then found out later that you were ineligible for the contributions because you made too much money in the year of contribution: Continue reading “Did You Contribute Too Much to a Roth IRA?”

Roth IRA or Roth 401(k)?

February 18, 2016

We’ve recently received several calls on our Financial Helpline from people who entered their Roth 401(k) contributions as Roth IRA contributions in tax software and were told that they had over-contributed. Since Roth 401(k) plans are relatively new, it’s easy to get these mixed up but the differences are important and not just when filing your taxes. Let’s start with the similarities. Both accounts allow you to contribute after-tax dollars that can grow to be tax-free after age 59 ½ as long as you’ve had the account for at least 5 years. Now let’s look at the differences: Continue reading “Roth IRA or Roth 401(k)?”

5 Ways You’re Messing Up Retirement in Your 20’s

February 17, 2016

I know how far off retirement seems when you’re bogged down with student loans and credit card debt while being more concerned about buying a house and having kids (let alone putting THEM through college) in the coming years. Retirement seems more like something your parents and your boss should be worried about. I’m right there with you! But I also know that whether or not you are actually able to retire in that distant-feeling future can be a direct result of your financial behavior in your 20’s. Here are the 5 things that I see 20-somethings do that can really mess up their chances for a comfortable retirement. Continue reading “5 Ways You’re Messing Up Retirement in Your 20’s”

Don’t Let a Backdoor Roth IRA Become a Trapdoor IRA

February 03, 2016

Updated February, 2018

I was talking with a married couple the other day who were happy that they both made high incomes but unhappy that they could not contribute to Roth IRAs and enjoy some tax-free income later in retirement. According to IRS rules, married couples who file their taxes jointly cannot contribute to a Roth IRA when their combined incomes exceed certain amounts.

However, they perked up a bit when I mentioned the possibility of still contributing to a Roth IRA – even with their high incomes – using an idea called a “backdoor” Roth IRA. It works like this: even though the IRS has an income limit on Roth IRA contributions, there is no income limit on Roth IRA conversions from a traditional IRA. So step one would be to open traditional IRAs (one for each of them) and contribute up to the annual maximum amount to each traditional IRA.

Step two would then be to convert their freshly funded traditional IRAs into Roth IRAs and pay tax on any growth that took place inside the traditional IRAs between the time they deposited money into them and the time they converted them to Roth IRAs (which should be close to nothing, assuming the steps are done within a week of each other). That’s how the “backdoor Roth IRA” works in its simplest form. But there may be a catch…

Pre-existing traditional IRA balances complicate matters

As with any financial strategy that may sound a little too good to be true, the backdoor Roth IRA strategy comes with an expensive gotcha if not done properly. Thanks to the IRS pro-rata rule, taxes on a converted traditional IRA are due not just on the funds being converted, but may also be due on any other non-Roth, never-taxed IRA monies, too.

As with any financial strategy that may sound a little too good to be true, the backdoor Roth strategy comes with an expensive gotcha if not done properly

For instance, suppose you also had a 401(k) from a previous job worth $45,000 that you rolled into a traditional IRA after leaving that job. Using the backdoor Roth IRA strategy, you deposit $5,500 of after-tax money into a separate traditional IRA and then quickly convert that $5,500 to a Roth IRA.

At first, it seems this conversion is tax free since the $5,500 traditional IRA didn’t grow to more than the original $5,500 before you converted it to a Roth IRA. The catch is that the pro-rata rule requires you to consider all untaxed traditional IRA money that you have, not just the money that you are converting when calculating any tax you may owe on the conversion.

Running the numbers

In this case, the after-tax $5,500 IRA contribution would be approximately 11% of your total traditional IRA funds ($5,500/[$45,000 + $5,500]), which means the IRS will assess taxes due against 89% of the $5,500 conversion. Instead of a $5,500 Roth IRA conversion that was more-or-less tax-free (no growth in the account yet), you will instead owe taxes on just over 89% of the $5,500 or $4,895, which would be taxed as ordinary income.

Avoiding the trapdoor

So how does one avoid this backdoor trapdoor? Ideally, anyone considering a backdoor Roth IRA should avoid rolling over any old 401(k) dollars into a traditional IRA until the calendar year after the conversion. If you’re going to use this as an ongoing strategy, you could either leave old 401(k)s in their old plans or roll them into your existing 401(k). If you’ve already rolled an old 401(k) into an IRA, you may be able to roll these funds into your current 401(k), assuming the plan allows for these incoming rollovers.

What if you have a traditional IRA that you’ve made past contributions into from years past? Well, you’re out of luck. You can still do the backdoor Roth IRA, but it won’t be tax-free.

Even though your income exceeds the limits, you can still contribute to a Roth IRA. You just have to use the backdoor. However, the key to a tax-free backdoor Roth IRA contribution is making sure there are no other untaxed traditional IRA dollars lurking in the background, ready to turn your backdoor Roth IRA into a taxable trapdoor IRA.

Want more helpful financial guidance, delivered directly to your inbox? Sign up to receive our posts, written by financial planners who work with people like you every day. No sales pitch EVER (being unbiased is the foundation of what we do), just the best our awesome planners have to offer. Click here to join.

How To Become A Millionaire In Just 15 Minutes

January 19, 2016

You can’t help but talk about the lottery with a jackpot sitting at about $1.5 billion dollars. One of my colleagues, Teig Stanley, was talking to me about a recent conversation he had with our colleague, Doug. Here is what he said: Continue reading “How To Become A Millionaire In Just 15 Minutes”

Financial Rules Of Thumb: Retirement Savings

November 11, 2015

Continuing my financial rules of thumb series, this week let’s talk about a question that pretty much every person has asked me on our Financial Helpline: How much should I be saving for retirement and how much do I need total? While the answer varies depending on each person’s circumstances, goals and ultimately their values, there are some rules of thumb for those who either don’t feel like running a retirement estimator calculation or who just aren’t quite sure yet what their goals are. Continue reading “Financial Rules Of Thumb: Retirement Savings”