How Would You Answer This Million Dollar Retirement Question?
June 09, 2017A recent article in the Wall Street Journal asked a question that has led to one of my favorite conversation starters, both with clients and over beverages at my local watering hole: “Would you rather have $1 million or $5,000 per month in retirement?” To me, the way a person answers that question tells me a lot about how their mind works around money. So far, the answers I get are split about 50/50. Here’s what I’ve learned:
I’ll take it all right now, please.
Those people who choose the lump sum tend to have a strong belief in their ability to be fiscally sound. When asked what they’d do with the money, they typically say that they would pay down every penny of debt, make a luxury purchase or two, then live fairly frugally to preserve the remaining money, while investing it to get some growth. Their hope is to be able to grow that initial lump sum well beyond the starting amount and also do some good in the world.
I’d rather keep a steady paycheck.
On the other hand, the people who say they’d rather have the monthly income tend to be wary of becoming one of those tragic stories about people who “had it all” and then blew it. They feel like they can live on the monthly income with ease and save a portion of it for future generations or charitable work. The WSJ goes into the psychology of this choice, which is something called “the illusion of wealth” versus “the illusion of poverty,” but you’re better off just reading the article to understand that one better.
Are you focusing on the right number?
Why do I mention this debate? So many people that I have talked to regarding retirement are completely fixated on getting to some “magic number” in their 401(k) before they’ll feel safe to retire. When I meet people who are locked in on needing X number of dollars in order to retire, they are almost always already in excellent shape for retirement. Why? I find that they’ve been so laser focused on the dollar value of their accounts that they haven’t really thought about the monthly income that the portfolio could generate.
In many cases they’ve saved enough that they can afford to have a higher monthly income than their current income! I can’t count the number of times I’ve told someone that they can walk back to their desk because they are choosing to, not because they need the paycheck.
The number that counts.
When we prepare retirement projections, the most important number – in my opinion – is the monthly income that a person will have from all sources (Social Security, pension, investment accounts, retirement accounts, etc.) during retirement. After all, most people have a lifestyle that requires a rather consistent monthly income. If that income, plus some, can be replaced today – work truly becomes an option, not a requirement.
Find your number.
What can you do? Run retirement projections at least annually. This is probably the most important thing anyone can do to track their progress toward financial security. After a few years, your projections should show a trend. If you’re doing things right, you’ll see that trend improve with each year. When it doesn’t, you can decide what actions to take in order to get the trend line back to being a positive. Regardless of your stance on the question of a big lump sum vs. a steady monthly income, running a projection to see how much income you can expect to have in retirement will help you determine a lot of financial decisions between now & then. To steal a line from Nike: when it comes to running retirement projections, JUST DO IT.
